Saying goodbye to someone we love is never easy, especially if
it’s our partner or spouse. More and more people are involved in
long-distance relationships and many of us have experienced this challenging
separation first hand. We have waited to see our partner for so long and
only get to see them for a short time before they are off again. These feelings of separation protest3 or not wanting to let our partner go after we see them are a very normal experience.
Luckily, long-distance relationships can be just as satisfying and stable as relationships with those who are in close proximity3. There are many new ways to maintain feelings of closeness or proximity without being physically near our partner. While physical closeness is still a desire of most of us in these relationships, the ability to contact our partner through technology has greatly advanced. In addition, there are ways to feel psychologically close through replaying of memories or looking at pictures. This is a useful tool to use during time of separation, but does not necessarily replace the feeling of being face to face with our partner.
But there are differences in how attachment is experienced in close and long-distance relationships. For those of us who have been in a long-distance relationship, we have experienced the vicious reunion-separation cycle time and time again. The goodbyes cause us to experience distress that may target the attachment system. Those we love make us feel safe and being separated from them may leave us feeling anxious2.
For those of us in long-distance relationships, we rely heavily on the reunion experience after a long time away from our partner. This style of relationship can leave us feeling lonely or lost at time, but that does not necessarily predict a secure attachment1. In long-distance relationships it is very common for us to feel decreased relationship satisfaction following two weeks of our partner departing, or even less1.
In certain circumstances, such as military relationships, this cycle may be experienced differently due to the additional risks that armed forces face when they travel overseas. These couples often face uncertainty of whether or not their spouse is okay or if they will return home. This is often reflected in non-deployed spouse’s attachment and reaction to their partner being deployed.
Based on the dangers of the military, many wives of deployed spouses reported avoidance behaviors while their partner was deployed1. In addition, reports of anxious thoughts were described in the last few weeks awaiting their spouse’s arrival back home. A unique aspect of this was those who experience avoidance and anxiety while their spouse or partner is deployed, was that positive, secure attachment was restored upon their spouses return3. However, the reunion does not always produce immediate relationship harmony. It may take time for the relationship to return to its previous status. This shows that though feelings fluctuate while our partner is away, it is still possible to maintain a secure attachment and a healthy relationship across far distances.
Signs that signal that we are in a healthy long-distance relationship may be an increase in “we-ness.” The greater sense of couple hood we have with our far away partner or spouse may result in a shared identity, leading to a greater sense of security2.
Long-distance relationships aren’t for all of us, but for those of us who are foraging the way and driving (or flying) to see our partner, it is important to keep in mind that all types of relationships can be successful. It’s never easy to let our partner go, but the joy of the reunion that is to come, may be worth the wait.
1Borelli,
J. L., Sbarra, D. A., Snavely, J. E., McMakin, D. L., Coffey, J. K., Ruiz, S.
K., … Chung, S. Y. (2014). With or without you: Preliminary evidence that
attachment avoidance predicts nondeployed spouses’ reactions to relationship
challenges during deployment.
Professional Psychology: Research and Practice, 45(6), 478–487. https://doi-org.ezproxy2.library.colostate.edu/10.1037/a0037780.supp
2Borelli,
J. L., Sbarra, D. A., Randall, A. K., Snavely, J. E., St. John, H. K., &
Ruiz, S. K. (2013). Linguistic indicators of wives’ attachment security and
communal orientation during military deployment. Family Process, 52(3), 535–554. https://doi-org.ezproxy2.library.colostate.edu/10.1111/famp.12031
3Pistole,
M. C. (2010). Long-distance romantic couples: An attachment theoretical
perspective. Journal of Marital and
Family Therapy, 36(2), 115–125. https://doi-org.ezproxy2.library.colostate.edu/10.1111/j.1752-0606.2009.00169.x